Original Research
It is the glycaemic response to, not the carbohydrate content of food that matters in diabetes and obesity: The glycaemic index revisited
Submitted: 18 April 2016 | Published: 19 August 2016
About the author(s)
David Unwin, General Practice, Norwood Surgery, United KingdomDavid Haslam, Chair National Obesity Forum, Luton University Hospital, United Kingdom
Geoffrey Livesey, Royal Society of Medicine, United Kingdom
Abstract
Background: The low-carbohydrate diet for diabetes and obesity is over 200 years old. A new lease of life comes with evidence for its beneficial effects supplied by research into the value of low-glycaemic index (GI) foods in diabetes control. While trialling this approach it became evident that professionals and patients had previously misunderstood the index leading to
errors in food choices.
Aim: To explore the importance of the GI for those with T2D and improve understanding of the likely effect of various foods on blood glucose.
Setting: A 9000 patient United Kingdom (UK) primary care practice.
Methods: Relevant supporting studies were examined and data were reviewed from a
previously published case-series with new data relating to the effect of the approach on the whole practice over a period of three years. An improved interpretation of the GI using a ‘teaspoons of sugar equivalent’ was developed as an aide to understanding. We looked at quality markers for diabetes and obesity such as HbA1c and weight.
Results: Our approach was readily understood by patients and staff, helping to achieve significant improvements in diabetes control and weight. The practice as a whole compared to the average for the area was found to have; a significantly better quality of diabetes control, lower obesity prevalence whilst spending around £40 000 less per year on drugs for diabetes.
Conclusion: Greater consideration needs to be given to the harmful effects of high-GI starchy foods in the treatment and prevention of obesity and diabetes. Patient compliance and outcomes justify our approach in a primary care setting.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 118737Total article views: 81575
Crossref Citations
1. A role for low-carbohydrate diets in type 2 diabetes
George Winter
Journal of Prescribing Practice vol: 1 issue: 6 first page: 270 year: 2019
doi: 10.12968/jprp.2019.1.6.270
2. Low-carbohydrate diet in diabetes mellitus treatment
Hana Krejčí, Jan Vyjídák, Matej Kohutiar
Vnitřní lékařství vol: 64 issue: 7-8 first page: 742 year: 2018
doi: 10.36290/vnl.2018.102
3. Meeting the challenge of insulin resistance in general practice
George Winter
Practice Nursing vol: 33 issue: 2 first page: 78 year: 2022
doi: 10.12968/pnur.2022.33.2.78
4. Adapting diabetes medication for low carbohydrate management of type 2 diabetes: a practical guide
Campbell Murdoch, David Unwin, David Cavan, Mark Cucuzzella, Mahendra Patel
British Journal of General Practice vol: 69 issue: 684 first page: 360 year: 2019
doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704525
5. Advising Lifestyle Management for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
David Morris
Independent Nurse vol: 2020 issue: 10 first page: 20 year: 2020
doi: 10.12968/indn.2020.10.20
6. Metabolic syndrome
Anthony McNamara
InnovAiT: Education and inspiration for general practice vol: 12 issue: 10 first page: 582 year: 2019
doi: 10.1177/1755738019864615
7. Low Carbohydrate Dietary Approaches for People With Type 2 Diabetes—A Narrative Review
Sean D. Wheatley, Trudi A. Deakin, Nicola C. Arjomandkhah, Paul B. Hollinrake, Trudi E. Reeves
Frontiers in Nutrition vol: 8 year: 2021
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.687658
8.
Evaluation of improved cassava (
Manihot esculenta Crantz)
varieties and associated products for proximate, cyanogenic potential and glycemic indices
Gregory Nonyalim Nwaliowe, Emmanuel Oladeji Alamu, Rasaki Adegoke Sanusi, Busie Maziya-Dixon
CyTA - Journal of Food vol: 21 issue: 1 first page: 20 year: 2023
doi: 10.1080/19476337.2022.2152873
9. A low-carb diet for diabetes: the latest evidence
George Winter
Practice Nursing vol: 31 issue: 4 first page: 176 year: 2020
doi: 10.12968/pnur.2020.31.4.176
